Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 4 de 4
Filtrar
Mais filtros











Base de dados
Intervalo de ano de publicação
1.
Pediatr Neurosurg ; 57(6): 396-406, 2022.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-36252549

RESUMO

INTRODUCTION: Following cranial irradiation, there is an increased risk of developing secondary neoplasms, especially meningiomas. Despite childhood cancer survivors who have undergone cranial irradiation having an increased risk of acquiring radiation-induced meningioma (RIM), there is no widely used standard guideline for meningioma screening. METHODS: At a single institution, we reviewed three adult survivors of childhood cancer who were treated for RIM between 2010 and 2020. We recorded age at diagnosis for the primary lesion, the radiation dose, age at RIM diagnosis, and tumor characteristics including treatment, pathology, and outcome. Two had had T-cell acute lymphocytic leukemia and one a rhabdomyosarcoma. The age of diagnosis of the RIM ranged from 20 to 40 years, with latencies ranging from 18 to 33 years. All lesions were classified as WHO Grade I meningiomas, and only 1 patient had a subsequent recurrence. A literature search identified articles that address RIM: a total of 684 cases were identified in 36 publications. RESULTS: Mean radiation doses ranged from 1.4 gray to 70 gray. Mean age of diagnosis for secondary meningioma ranged from 8 to 53.4 years old, with latency periods ranging from 2.8 to 44 years. Given variability in the way that investigators have published their results, it is difficult to make a single recommendation for RIM screening. Using our experience and the literature, we devised two different screening protocols and calculated their expense. CONCLUSIONS: We recommend that data be standardized in a registry to provide greater insight into the clinical and resource allocation questions, especially as long-term survival of children with pediatric cancer into full adulthood becomes more commonplace worldwide.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Meníngeas , Meningioma , Neoplasias Induzidas por Radiação , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras , Criança , Adulto , Humanos , Adolescente , Adulto Jovem , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Meningioma/etiologia , Meningioma/patologia , Neoplasias Induzidas por Radiação/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Induzidas por Radiação/etiologia , Neoplasias Induzidas por Radiação/diagnóstico , Irradiação Craniana/efeitos adversos , Leucemia-Linfoma Linfoblástico de Células Precursoras/etiologia , Neoplasias Meníngeas/radioterapia
2.
Surg Neurol Int ; 12: 144, 2021.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33948314

RESUMO

BACKGROUND: Poorer outcomes for infratentorial tumor resection have been reported. There is a lack of large multicenter analyses describing infratentorial surgery outcomes in older patients. We characterized outcomes in patients aged ≥65 years undergoing infratentorial cranial surgery. METHODS: The National Surgical Quality Improvement Project database was queried from 2012 to 2018 for patients ≥18 years undergoing elective infratentorial cranial surgery for tumor resection. Patients were grouped into 65-74 years, ≥75 years, and 18-64 years cohorts. Multivariable regressions compared outcome measures. RESULTS: Of 2212 patients, 28.3% were ≥65 years, of whom 24.8% were ≥75 years. Both older subpopulations had worse American Society of Anesthesiologists classification compared to controls (P < 0.01) and more comorbidities. Patients 65-74 and ≥75 years had higher rates of major complication (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 1.77, 95% CI = 1.13-2.79 and aOR = 3.44, 95% CI = 1.96-6.02, respectively), prolonged length of stay (LOS) (aOR = 1.89, 95% CI = 1.15-3.12 and aOR = 3.00, 95% CI = 1.65-5.44, respectively), and were more likely to be discharged to a location other than home (aOR = 2.43, 95% CI =1.73-3.4 and aOR = 3.41, 95% CI = 2.18-5.33, respectively) relative to controls. Patients ≥75 had higher rates of readmission (aOR = 1.86, 95% CI = 1.13-3.08) and mortality (aOR = 3.28, 95% CI = 1.21-8.89) at 30 days. CONCLUSION: Patients ≥65 years experienced more complications, prolonged LOS, and were less often discharged home than adults <65 years. Patients ≥75 years had higher rates of 30-day readmission and mortality. There is a need for careful preoperative optimization in older patients undergoing infratentorial tumor cranial surgery.

3.
J Clin Neurosci ; 83: 88-95, 2021 Jan.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33342625

RESUMO

With longevity increasing in the United States, more older individuals are presenting with supratentorial brain tumors. Despite improved perioperative management, there is persistent disparity in surgical resection rates among patients aged 65 years or older. We aim to assess the effects of advanced age (≥65 years) on 30-day outcomes in patients with supratentorial tumors who underwent craniotomy for supratentorial tumor resection. Data obtained in adults who underwent supratentorial tumor resections was extracted from the prospectively-collected American College of Surgeons: National Surgical Quality Improvement Program (NSQIP; 2012-2018) database. Using multivariate regression, we compared odds of major and minor complications; prolonged length-of-stay (LOS); discharge anywhere other than home; and 30-day readmission, reoperation, and mortality rates between patients aged 18-64 years (the control cohort) and those 65-74 years or ≥75 years of age. Of the 14,234 patients who underwent craniotomy for supratentorial tumors and met inclusion criteria, 30.7% were ≥65 years of age; 71.4% of these were 65-74 years and 28.6% were ≥75 years old. Compared to the control group, both older subpopulations had more medical comorbidities. Both older subgroups had increased odds of major complications and prolonged LOS relative to the control group. Older patients had greater odds of mortality at 30 days. Advanced age, defined as ≥65 years, was significantly associated with higher odds of complications, prolonged LOS, and mortality within the 30-day post- operative period after adjusting for potential confounders. Age is one important consideration when prospectively risk-stratifying patients to minimize and mitigate suboptimal perioperative outcomes.


Assuntos
Complicações Pós-Operatórias/epidemiologia , Neoplasias Supratentoriais/cirurgia , Adolescente , Adulto , Idoso , Craniotomia/efeitos adversos , Feminino , Humanos , Tempo de Internação/estatística & dados numéricos , Masculino , Pessoa de Meia-Idade , Readmissão do Paciente/estatística & dados numéricos , Reoperação/estatística & dados numéricos , Estados Unidos , Adulto Jovem
4.
World Neurosurg ; 138: 425-435, 2020 06.
Artigo em Inglês | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32251831

RESUMO

Glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) is the most common and aggressive primary malignancy of the central nervous system. The standard used to monitor disease progression and therapeutic response has been magnetic resonance imaging, which is usually obtained preoperatively and postoperatively. Patients with GBM are monitored every 2-3 months and scans are repeated until progression is detected. Sometimes there is an inability to detect tumor progression or difficulty in differentiating tumor progression from pseudoprogression. With the difficulty of distinguishing disease progression, as well as the cost of imaging, there may be a need for the existence of a noninvasive liquid biopsy. There is no reliable biomarker for GBM that can be used for liquid biopsy, but if one could be detected in serum or cerebrospinal fluid and vary with tumor burden, then, it could be developed into one. MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are short, single-stranded, noncoding RNAs that posttranscriptionally control gene expression. They play vital roles in tumor progression, migration, invasion, and stemness. Because miRNAs are secreted in stable forms in bodily fluid, either via extracellular vesicles or in cell-free form, they have great potential as biomarkers that can be used for liquid biopsy. Various miRNAs that are dysregulated in GBM have been identified in tissue, cerebrospinal fluid, and serum samples. There needs to be standardization of sample collection and quantification for both cell-free and exosomal-derived samples. Further studies need to be performed on larger cohorts to evaluate the sensitivity and specificity of not just miRNAs but most potential biomarkers.


Assuntos
Neoplasias Encefálicas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Encefálicas/patologia , MicroRNA Circulante/biossíntese , Glioblastoma/diagnóstico , Glioblastoma/patologia , Biópsia Líquida/métodos , RNA Neoplásico/biossíntese , Neoplasias Encefálicas/cirurgia , MicroRNA Circulante/genética , Glioblastoma/cirurgia , Humanos , RNA Neoplásico/genética
SELEÇÃO DE REFERÊNCIAS
DETALHE DA PESQUISA